TEACHER'S WELL-BEING: A PROBLEM-FOCUSED COPING APPROACH

Exercise, yoga, good planning, balance between family and work, meditation, mindfulness, are some of the things I have just recently found when I tried to get valuable info on how to increase the well-being. Obviously, there are different positions with respect to this point, and I do not pretend to diminish the importance of the different approaches to improve well-being in our teacher’s life, which comes back to my mind a Coldplay lyrics song which says, "Nobody said it was easy", and everyone who has experience, not matter if it were little or not, would certainly recognise that teaching is not easy at all. For that reason, in this article you will find relevant information about some well-known approaches and tips to cope with stress and burnout, in order to increase our well-being. Picture 1: Credit Stuart Kime Before that, let us see succinctly the answer of the following questions: what is well-being?, why is it important? What factors can affect it? What is well-being

FEEDBACK: WHAT, WHY AND HOW IN VIRTUAL LEARNING ENVIRONMENTS (VLE)

Feedback has become a key element for formative assessment and different approaches such as Competency Based Learning, being the latter particularly the case of the country I live by now.

Due to its relevancy, we are going to have a brief analysis of definitions of feedback, its types and how can we give effective feedback. Although this article will be focused on VLE the recommendations below can be applied in face-to-face lessons.

Credit picture Julian Mesa

What is feedback?

According to Wang, Tlili, Lehman, Lu & Huang (2021) feedback is the exchange of information regarding to "improve learning performance, in order to readjust student's cognition, motivation & behaviour"(p. 3; Máñez, 2020). Similarly, Wiggins (as cited in Peroukidou & Kofou, 2019) defines feedback as "actionable information (...) empower(ing) the student to make intelligent adjustment when she applies it to her next attempt to perform" (p, 156).

We could claim with no doubt that feedback is based on the socio-constructivist theory (Hughes, Wood & Kitagawa, 2014; Päivi & Hanna, 2017) which underpins that learning is the product of individual knowledge processing in conjunction with interactions with others in a given social context.

When thinking about feedback we have to take into account its types, among which we have, Verification Feedback, " is exactly how it sounds and is nothing more than the instructor verifying that an answer is correct or incorrect" (Steele & Holbeck, 2018, p. 3; Máñez, 2020), and on the other hand, Elaborative Feedback, the purpose of which is not only to indicate whether an answer is correct or not, but to give "explanations or clues about why an answer is correct or incorrect without explicitly mention the correct answer" (Máñez, 2020, p. 58) in this way knowledge is consolidated helping pupils to "avoid the same mistake next time" (Steele & Holbeck, 2018, p. 4).

Additionally, Chetwyng & Dobbyn (2012) propose the following taxonomy of feedback:

Picture 1. A Taxonomy of Feedback by Chetwynd & Dobbyn (2012)

As it is shown feedback must not be only focus on content (concepts, theories, etc.) but also on skills (verbal, numerical, planning). Although attention should be paid to retrospective part, in other words, the current student's performance in comparison with the goal set (Retrospective-on-content/skills), feedback should also serve pupils to make future adjustments (Future-altering-on-content/skills) and avoid the same mistakes (Chetwynd & Dobbyn, 2012; Hughes, Wood & Kitagawa, 2014).

Why is it important?

We all must aim to give Elaborative Feedback but if we face the reality this is simply time consuming. But just focus on indicating whether the answer is correct or not and add a congrats the type: "Excellent, good job! apart from becoming a cliché, we will make students more dependent on the teacher to know if he is doing well, returning to that old teacher-centered paradigm. Moreover, several studies show that this situation generates greater dissatisfaction in students by not knowing why they have obtained a certain grade due to the lack of a quality feedback that shed light on what they really need to know (Hughes, Wood & Kitagawa, 2014; Päivi & Hanna, 2017; Carruthers et al., 2015).

For our feedback to be effective first it should be personalised, in other words, it must be based on relevant data we get from our student's performance and why not to add student's name instead of just saying: "There is something missing here", or "It was OK, but next time don't forget to...". Our goal must be to give a pinch humanity to the message we want to convey in our feedback (Trigonaki, 2019; Steele & Holbeck, 2018).

Second, feedback should be given timely, which is as soon as the learner has finished the task or activity that is going to be evaluated (Steele & Holbeck, 2018; Trigonaki, 2019; Peroukidou & Kofou, 2019; Wang et al., 2021) or even during the process of one task or activity having a great impact on the final product. Different from a face-to-face lesson in VLE time is really short and we tend to struggle to complete the academic plan or even worse if you have book to finish before ending the year. However, it is compulsory to give feedback as soon as possible to have the intended effect.

What can we do so our feedback has the aforementioned characteristics and to be less time consuming?

1. Giving feedback to large cohort

Some of the advantages are to give feedback to several students in a single lesson, feedback can be sent as a written document or presented in class allowing the interacting of students. Furthermore, we can adapt feedback to our group of students and use data of other groups to help them avoid possible future mistakes. Feedback can be posted on our LMS (Google Classroom, Canvas, etc.) as material for future reference (Harris, 2017).

2. Audio Feedback

Both in virtual and face-to-face classrooms, feedback can be given in writing or orally. However, thinking about giving feedback to each of our students can be utterly overwhelming. Despite this, some studies on distance learning emphasize the importance of giving Audio feedback, rather than written messages.

One of the advantages we have by using audios is that we can add that needed humanity in our messages thank to the use of our voice, something difficult for a written message. Also, we can share more information for the same amount of time we could have spent typing a message, above all if we are not good at it. And even if recording an audio feedback took the same time as written feedback, Audio feedback will always be more significant. This can have a positive effect on our students because they will have a clearer and easier message to understand, allowing them to be more committed and willing to respond to teachers' feedback initiating a conversation about ways to improve his performance, increasing autonomy, due to the socio-constructivist role of feedback (Carruthers, 2015; Päivi & Hanna, 2017).

How can we do it? Some LMS, like Blackboard Learn+, have an built-in audio system to give feedback. But not all our institutions are willing to invest in a platform like that. In my case I use Google Classroom and Vocaroo (www.vocaroo.com), in case of the latter is because it allows you record a large audio file for free and easy to use. After you record the audio Vocaroo generates a unique link that is possible to copy and paste wherever you need, avoiding uploading or downloading a heavy audio file. Thus, replacing in this way written feedback with audio feedback, which contains a warm and more understandable message for the student (Carruthers, 2015).

Picture 2. Teacher's view in Google Classroom when sending a Vocaroo link.

Picture 3. Student's view in Google Classroom when receiving a Vocaroo link.

Conclusions

Feedback plays an important role in contributing to a student-centered education, because it not only allows setting the level of achievement but also provides valuable information that can be used by students on future occasions in order to improve their performance. Most of us are now teaching in virtual o distance education contexts, for that reason to continue looking for new opportunities to provide our students with valuable feeback is a must, takin into account the socio-affective part that it plays, being this point greatly affected due to virtual learning. If we make an effort to provide personalized feedback, on time both in groups and in an individual basis, and using Audio Feedback, be sure we are doing our contribution to education.

References:

Carruthers, C., McCarron, B., Bolan, P., Devine, A., McMahon-Beattie, U. & Burns, A. (2015). 'I like the sound of that' - an evaluation of providing audio feedback via the virtual learning envrionment for summative assessment. Assessmente & Evaluation in Higher Education, 40(3), 352-370. https://doi.org/10.1080/02602938.2014.917145

Chetwynd, F. & Dobbyn, C. (2012). Consitency v autonomy: effective feedback to a very large cohort. Paper from the Annual STEM conference 2012. Retrieved April 27, 2021 from https://www.advance-he.ac.uk/knowledge-hub/consistency-v-autonomy-effective-feedback-very-large-cohort  

Harris, N. (2017) Providing efferctive cohort feedback on examinations. Cardiff University College of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences. Retrieved April 27, 2021 from https://www.cardiff.ac.uk/learning-hub/view/providing-effective-cohort-feedback-on-examinations

Hughes, G., Wood, E. & Kitagawa, K. (2014) Use of self-referential (ipsative) feedback to motivate and guide distance learners. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 29(1), 31-44. DOI 10.1080/02680513.2014.921612

Máñez, I. (2020). ¿Influye la retroalimentación correctiva en el uso de la retroalimentación elaborada en un entorno digital? Psicología Educativa, 26(1), 57-65. https://doi.org/10.5093/psed2019a14

Päivi, R. & Hanna, V. (2017). Toward personal and emotional connectivity in mobile higher education through asynchronous formative audio feedback. British Journal of Educational Technology, 49 (2), 292 - 304. DOI 10.1111/bjet.12587

Peroukidou, V. & Kofou, I. (2019). The impact of feedback on Distance Education student's learning process. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 154-169. https://rpltl.eap.gr/images/2019/10-01-154-PEROUKIDOU-KOFOU.pdf

Steele, J. & Holbeck, R. (2018). Five elements that impact quality feedback in the online asynchronous classroom. Journal of Educators Online, 15(3), 1-5. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ1199171.pdf

Trigonaki, E. (2019). Student's perceptions regarding the strengths and weaknesses of written feedback in distance learning: The case of the TESOL M.Ed. of the HOU. Research Papers in Language Teaching and Learning, 10(1), 170-187. https://rpltl.eap.gr/images/2019/10-01-170-TRIGONAKI.pdf

Wang, H., Tlili, A., Lehman, J., Lu, H. & Huang, R. (2021). Investigating feedback implemented by instructors to support online competency-based learning (CBL): a multiple case study. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(5), 1-21. DOI 10.1186/s41239-021-00241-6

Spanish Version: https://cuttingedgeducation.blogspot.com/2021/04/retroalimentacion-que-por-que-y-como-en.html

Wanting to support my contribution: 

Comments